Close
Close
Search this website

Interested in hiring an FIU PhD?

The Department of Politics and International Relations is pleased to have exceptional students who are now on the job market. If you have any questions, please contact the individual candidate.

International Relations PhD Candidates and Recent Graduates 

  • Adam Ratzlaff, PhD Candidate in International Relations
    Dissertation Committee: Barry Levitt (Co-Chair), John Oates (Co-Chair), Eduardo Gamarra, Felix Martin, and Tawia Ansah.

    Dissertation Title: The Organization of American States & 20 Years of Contested Democratic Norms in the Americas

    Abstract: In 2001, representatives of 34 countries from across the Western Hemisphere gathered in Lima to sign the Inter-American Democratic Charter—a mechanism that provided the Organization of American States (OAS) with the mandate and tools to collectively defend democratic governance in the Americas. However, while there has been a notable decline in the number of military coups in the Americas, democratic backsliding and novel threats to democracy have emerged. By analyzing debates within the OAS, this dissertation explores how norms about the definition of democracy and what constitutes undemocratic actions are contested and how different responses and rhetorical approaches have shaped the erosion of democracy in the Americas since the passage of the Democratic Charter.

    Research Interests: Inter-American Affairs, Democracy, International Organizations, Sino-Latin American relations

    Email Address: aratzlaf@gmail.com
  • Grisel d'Elena, PhD Candidate in International Relations
    Chair and committee members: Dr Mesbahi (Chair), Dr Lob, Dr Cox and Dr Grenier (Religious Studies)

    Title of Dissertation: In Search of Agency: The International Response to the Rohingya Crisis, Regional Geopolitics, and Democracy, Ethnicity, Race, and Religion in Myanmar

    Abstract: This dissertation sheds light on how the factors of race, religion, failed democratization, and the permissibility of geopolitical actors have produced one of the most flagrant human rights atrocities against the Rohingya in Myanmar. Despite waves of displacement over the past three decades, the plight of the Rohingya has been underreported. Oftentimes, the Rohingya crisis has been ignored by the international community against the backdrop of Myanmar’s purportedly democratic reform process during the country’s transition away from military junta under the leadership of Aung San Suu Kyi. The military coup of 2021 coupled with the geopolitics of Myanmar, including the interests of China, and ASEAN in the region impacted both the stateless Rohingya and Myanmar’s citizens by producing international permissibility. One of the key themes of this study is the importance of providing agency to the Rohingya and other marginalized groups in the country by examining the dehumanization from the military and the international community's response to the humanitarian crisis. This dissertation provides a nuanced understanding of the historical, political, and cultural factors that have led to the ongoing crisis and emphasizes the need for both local and international actors to work together to find a just and sustainable solution.

    Research Interests: Statelessness, Foreign Policy, Geopolitics of China and Russia, International Organizations, Security theory

Political Science PhD Candidates and Recent Graduates 

  • Daniel I. Pedreira, PhD in Political Science, Graduated

    daniel.png

      Curriculum Vitae

      Dissertation Committee Members

      Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Dario V. Moreno

      Dissertation Committee Members: Dr. Tatiana Kostadinova, Dr. Eduardo A. Gamarra, and Dr. Matthew C. Mirow

    Research Interests: Executive branch politics, Cuban Politics, Latin American politics, democratization, authoritarianism.

    Dissertation Title: Semi-Presidentialism in Cuba: Institutionalization and Personalization under the 1940 Constitution

    Dissertation Abstract:

    The drafters of Cuba’s 1940 Constitution codified a semi-presidential system in the hopes of avoiding “the perils of presidentialism” that plagued the Cuban Republic’s early decades. Yet Cuba’s semi-presidential system lasted for less than twenty years. This dissertation seeks to determine the extent to which Cuba’s executive branch was institutionalized or personalistic in nature. Covering each presidential administration during the period, this dissertation takes a quantitative and qualitative approach towards analyzing several defining features of Cuban semi-presidentialism, including presidential and ministerial decrees, mentions of executives and institutions in newspaper and magazine headlines, the different roles of executive branch actors, and caricature themes in relation to different administrations. Notably, this dissertation represents the first study conducted on semi-presidentialism in Cuba. This dissertation will also impact the broader field of political science by contributing to the existing literature on semi-presidentialism. The findings may provide insights into why democracy collapsed in Cuba after only two decades of semi-presidentialism. The functions of semi-presidentialism under both democratic and authoritarian regimes during this period can offer useful comparisons into similarities and differences across regime types. In doing so, they can also shed light on prospects for democracy’s return to Cuba under the current authoritarian regime.

    Professional Website:http://danielpedreira.com

    Email:dpedreir@fiu.edu

  • Garrett Pierman, PhD in Political Science, Graduated 2021

    garrett.jpg

       Curriculum Vitae

       Program: Political Science

       Dissertation Committee Chair: Dr. Clement Fatovic

       Dissertation Committee Members: Dr. Alexander Barder, Dr. Ronald Cox, Dr. Whitney Bauman

    Title: A Future of Our Own Making: Technological Possibilities For Democracy

    Short Abstract: Early enthusiasm for the potential of digital platforms to invigorate and transform democracy has given way to concerns about whether digital politics is necessarily democratic. Broadly, this study seeks to examine how—and if—the internet functions as a public space conducive to democratic practices. The web offered something new- a means by which people could not only consume media (as was largely the case with radio and television) but could themselves become creators of content, critics, and commentators. This interactivity through the technological marvels of the internet could have resulted in a flourishing of democratic practices across the boundaries of class, race, gender, and geography. However, the construction of platforms such as Facebook and twitter, and the ways in which users inhabit them, may have less democratic results than the optimists hoped. With the increasing extent to which politics is conducted on the internet, through online platforms, scholars have begun to question the democratic potential of the web. The study surveys existing literature on digital deliberative democracy, then reads a history of the internet through Actor Network Theory, Gilles Deleuze, and others to theorize that the contemporary internet is an actor-network with capitalist internal resonances that empowers corporate interests to the detriment of everyday peoples’ ability to empower themselves and each other to participate in democratic deliberation.

    ORCID webpage: https:/orcid.org0000-0003-0157-405X

    Email: gpier018@fiu.edu